Kapuas Hulu, West Kalimantan – Deep in Indonesian Borneo, a groundbreaking initiative challenges traditional conservation methods by putting cash directly into the hands of local communities. The KehatiKu program, launched by scientific consultancy Borneo Futures, encourages residents to document wildlife encounters through a simple mobile app. In its first year, participants submitted nearly 175,000 records across 200,000 hectares, revealing thriving populations of endangered species like orangutans in unexpected places.
175,000 Sightings in One Year: A Data Explosion Begins

175,000 Sightings in One Year: A Data Explosion Begins (Image Credits: Unsplash)
Over 800 observers in nine remote villages transformed routine forest visits into valuable data collection efforts. Daily submissions reached 300 to 400, far exceeding initial targets of 40,000 observations. This surge followed the introduction of payments, which boosted participation from modest voluntary levels to thousands per village monthly.
Biologist Erik Meijaard, managing director of Borneo Futures, noted the program’s efficiency: “Every observation needs to be verified,” highlighting the manual review process that ensures accuracy before payouts. The data now fuels occupancy maps and informs government workshops on species like gibbons.
How KehatiKu Turns Phones into Conservation Tools
Participants download the free app and capture photos, videos, or audio of wildlife during everyday activities like farming or foraging. Verification by experts in Brunei confirms submissions, triggering payments scaled by species rarity – from about $0.30 for common birds to $6 for clear orangutan images. Observers limit entries to one per animal per day, preventing duplicates.
Dedicated users earn 100,000 to 5 million rupiah monthly ($6 to $292), often surpassing average local wages of 2-3 million rupiah. In villages like Nanga Embaloh and Sungai Ajung, this income supports schooling and savings, as one observer shared: “I feel much calmer and more independent now.”
| Species Example | Payment Range (USD) | Observation Type |
|---|---|---|
| Greater coucal (bird) | 0.29 | Photo |
| Bornean orangutan | Up to 6 | Clear photo/video |
| Gibbon | Variable | Audio call |
Communities Shift from Hunters to Stewards
In Nanga Embaloh, residents declared a hunting ban after discussions revealed wildlife’s income potential over poaching. Banners now enforce the rule, with self-policing ensuring compliance for villagers and outsiders alike. Orangutans, once viewed as garden raiders, became assets worth protecting.
Species records include Bornean orangutans, flat-headed cats, Sunda pangolins, rhinoceros hornbills, and more, confirming their presence in community forests bordering farms. Surveys show over 70% awareness and a third earning from the program, fostering pride in local biodiversity.
- 9,766 orangutan nest records in pilot villages.
- Increased women’s participation via WhatsApp groups for feedback.
- Cost under $1 per hectare annually across 200,000 hectares.
- Communities own data, using it for governance and negotiations.
Overcoming Hurdles for Scalable Impact
Manual verification strains resources, with monthly payouts totaling 100 million rupiah delivered by hand. Plans call for AI to handle growth. Long-term motivation remains key, as experts like Paul Ferraro emphasize additive incentives for lasting change.
Expansion eyes nationwide rollout if impacts prove positive, potentially sharing data globally. Meijaard stressed community ownership: “Ultimately it’s a community program. They run it, they own it.” Early bans and rising observations signal promise amid past failures, like $1 billion spent on orangutans with 100,000 lost from 2000-2019.
- KehatiKu collected 175,000 records at a fraction of traditional survey costs.
- Payments rival local wages, sparking hunting bans and stewardship.
- Data reveals hidden wildlife strongholds, guiding targeted protection.
This pilot proves financial incentives can align human needs with nature’s survival, offering a model where locals lead the charge. As Borneo balances development and diversity, programs like KehatiKu could tip the scales toward coexistence. What do you think about paying for conservation – viable path or short-term fix? Tell us in the comments.



